Hi {{first_name}}
I'm a coach who helps people build authority on LinkedIn.
I'm not a developer. I don't code. I barely understand how APIs work.
When I started building these GPTs, I worried they'd be too complicated for me to actually use myself.
That worry turned out to be pointless.
These GPTs work like having a conversation with someone who knows your business.
I tell them what I need. They handle the execution.
When I wanted to fix my LinkedIn profile positioning, I opened the Profile Optimiser, pasted what I had, answered a few questions about what I do and who I serve. Three minutes later I had a profile that actually worked.
I recorded a video and wanted twenty post ideas from it.
Dropped the transcript into the Content Miner, told it what angle I wanted, got twenty posts with hooks in about two minutes.
Fifteen conversations were going cold and I didn't want to spend an hour writing personalised follow-ups.
The Follow-Up Bot handled it.
The GPTs are straightforward - each one does a specific job without requiring complex prompts or technical knowledge.
Using them wasn't hard.
The hard part was deciding to stop doing everything manually and actually implement something that works.
I spent three years avoiding the simple system that generates leads.
Then I spent months doing it manually until I burned out.
The GPTs removed the excuse I'd been using to avoid consistency.
If I can write a LinkedIn message, I can use these GPTs.
That's the actual technical requirement.
Tomorrow at midnight, this closes.
The GPTs won't be available again.
The decision isn't whether the GPTs are too complicated.
The decision is whether staying consistent manually is worth the exhaustion.
I chose to make it easier. That's why my pipeline is full.
Jack
