Hey {{first_name}},
I started noticing the pattern everywhere.
My feed. My posts. Everyone's posts.
AI-generated content that looked fine to the person who posted it but read as generic slop to everyone else.
The problem wasn't that people were lazy.
It's that most people don't have time to learn copywriting. And even if they did, they wouldn't recognise good copy if it hit them in the face.
You can't fix what you can't see.
That's why everyone keeps posting AI content thinking it's decent whilst their engagement drops and nobody remembers what they wrote.
They genuinely believe it's good enough.
(It's like people who think they can sing because they sound fine in the shower. The acoustics are lying to you, mate.)
So I built something different.
A system that captures how professional copywriters think about content and applies it to your voice specifically.
Not generic templates. Your actual patterns, stories, and perspective.
Here's what you walk away with on Tuesday:
Your personal Content Sherpa, trained on your voice. Not a prompt you copy-paste. A custom system that knows how you talk when you're telling someone what you learned.
The visual creation system that turns posts into complete content assets without screaming "I used Midjourney."
The idea engine that ends blank-screen syndrome permanently. Systematic content generation that spots pain points worth addressing.
The custom GPT for 15 minutes of voice personalisation work after the workshop.
Lifetime access to the recording and all materials.
Most people think they're buying a workshop.
You're buying implementation.
The difference matters because information is everywhere. YouTube has free content. Blog posts explain frameworks. ChatGPT answers questions.
Implementation is where people fail.
They learn the concept, take notes, plan to do it later, and never actually build the system.
Then six months later they're watching another YouTube video about the same problem, taking the same notes, making the same plans.
It's like Groundhog Day, except Bill Murray eventually learns his lesson.
Tuesday eliminates that gap.
You watch me install it with a live volunteer. Then you build yours during the workshop. Ninety minutes later, you have a working system.
Not a plan to implement. An actual system creating posts.
The ghostwriter comparison isn't about suggesting you hire one instead.
It's about showing you what professional content creation actually costs when you pay someone else to do it right.
$800 monthly gets you competent posts that sound professional but generic.
$2,000 monthly gets you excellent posts from someone who captures your voice well.
Both require ongoing payment. Stop paying, stop getting content.
This system costs $97 once.
After Tuesday, you create posts in five minutes that demonstrate how you think. No monthly fees. No dependency on someone else's schedule.
One quality conversation from one quality post covers the investment.
A partnership opportunity like the one I mentioned yesterday with the 150K follower account returns it a hundred times over.
The recording is there if you can't make it live.
But the live Q&A is where specific situations get solved in real-time.
Someone asks about their technical industry. I show them how the system handles it. Everyone learns from the edge cases.
"How do I preserve client confidentiality in stories?" "Can this work for video scripts?" "What about highly regulated industries?"
These questions emerge during the session. The answers benefit everyone watching.
You can't get that from the recording alone.
Tomorrow is workshop day.
Your last easy yes before this becomes harder.
Either you install this system Tuesday and fix the AI slop problem permanently, or you keep posting generic content and hoping it improves somehow.
Reply "YES" and I'll send you the workshop link.
Jack
